Verses versus vices (3)

Stanza 44 of this continuing satire in free verse versus corruption and vices, is addressed to Heidi Mendoza.

“On the basis of her audit report that never was,” she told the Senate Blue Ribbon Committee that CoA chairman Guillermo Carague, Commissioner Emmanuel Dalman, and CoA directors did not help her in the investigation from 2001 to 2004 when Major General Carlos Garcia was AFP Comptroller. These lies were globally telecast and not only chairman Carague was embarrassed; all the other CoA chairmen were asked to explain why.

Through Heidi’s false claim — that CoA did not help her — the highly respected audit institution was put to shame.

Heidi besmirched and tarnished the honor and dignity of the CoA officials. The damage was irreparable.

Under no reasonable ordering of society can it be philosophically and judiciously asserted that Heidi’s right to free speech is higher than the right of CoA officials to their good name and their reputation. The esteem with which their peers hold them is the basis for their social relations, the backbone of their social interaction.

29

But who really is accountable

Grace and Heidi caused all the trouble

Can you hold the lawmakers responsible

Do they sign the vouchers and the payroll

30

They only sign what is endorsable

Most likely the head of IA is answerable

Now let us deviate without the rhyme

And trace the tension of our time

31

May I ask the following questions

So you can have some sort of conclusion

Who has the power of contempt?

To compel employees in the government

32

To submit a complete list of congressmen

Who received releases for their constituent

Who has the power to hold the salaries?

Who fails to obey demand under query

33

Who keeps the general accounts of government?

Nobody else but Grace and Heidi again and again

Any movement of funds from item to item

Is impossible to occur without their knowing them.

34

Any illegal juggling of funds could have been stopped

How come Grace and Heidi did not stop the DAP?

From the auditor’s instinct and point of view

Is a failure to obey the fundamental law.

35

Article IX-D of our 1987 Constitution

Section 12-2 of the Code of audit commission

Command to Pulido Tan and Heidi Mendoza

To control the release of DAP and Malampaya

36

“He did not deny any of our findings/”

“He did not say we missed something.”

“That’s great. That’s vindicating.”

“We can disallow, demand refunding.”

37

A newspaper on 28 August 2013

“Quit erroneous, PDAF reporting!”

“Resign for irreparably damaging”

“Disservice to Way Kurat for grave mistaking!”

38

In August was “Kahindik hindik” disclosure

In September was “explosive” exposure

Malampaya explosion cocksure to occur

Premature again is the bomb detonator.

39

Why always the haste to hit the headline

Why all the fuss? P5-billion unsettled cash advance

In 1999 it was P7.7 billion more than

CoA then had it settled without beating the drum.

40

CoA Chair Pulido Tan is like Ferdinand

And Heidi Mendoza is like Magellan,

Peas in a pod whom both assumed the greatness

of the explorer who discovered our islands on 16 March 1521

They believe everything great in CoA started since they began.

41

They boast of having won the bright spot in London

But old folks found them as silly as cartoon

Citizen participatory audit violates the Constitution.

No basis whatsoever for any legislation.

42

Given the track record of Grace and Heidi

They will pick auditors from their party

Not from the plantilla of the audit commission

Causing chaos and widespread protestation.

43

Premature disclosure of audit finding

Is common hallmark of Heidi’s auditing

Pasiklab muna saka na ang ebidensya

Dismissed and kaso sa korte suprema.

44

Heidi’s tall tale of lies goes on to flourish

Her tongue in revenge continues to unleash

Words that poison with intent to demolish

Even one’s good name, one’s blood and flesh.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *