“A leap of faith into the great unknown.”
That’s how a worried Senator Francis Escudero described the venture that two state-owned banks would be legislated into making with the passage of the Maharlika Investment Fund law.
That’s the same leap that the Government Service Insurance System and Social Security System were asked to make when the MIF idea was first floated last year, only for the state insurers to be dropped from the kitty pool amid the uproar and backlash.
By their very nature, banks loan money and invest, but they have always had the option of where to put in their moolah. However, in the case of the Land Bank of the Philippines and the Development Bank of the Philippines, as captive investors, they’re in for the MIF ride, whether the road is bumpy or not.
And that’s what troubles Escudero as he said that “as presently worded” in the Senate’s MIF bill, he could not see provisions detailing the bare minimum that the two banks’ investments — initially P50 billion for LandBank and P25 billion for DBP — would make.
Senate hearings have established that the two government banks earn between six to eight percent of loaned or invested money, thus Escudero reasoned out that it may be financially sound to put at seven percent the threshold (or minimum) return on equity of LandBank and DBP.
The senator warned that the banks cannot be allowed to go “bankrupt” because of the unsettled RoE and, if I may add, because of a failed venture which, in business, is almost always a possibility as turning in profits.
Reading between the lines, the concern may be of the MIF making money but with the two banks being left holding the bag, left out of the profit-sharing due to a rushed MIF law that did not put in black and white a matter as simple as pegging the RoE.
Naysayers have warned that the MIF may just end up as one huge corruption enterprise as the corporation tasked to manage the fund invests in a mixed bag of instruments like local and foreign bonds, equities, and foreign currencies.
Here is where Congress should ensure that the MIF law would have enough safeguards not only for the two banks but also for the other players, including the government that will be infusing taxpayers’ money and state earnings.
If the MIF is to succeed in promoting economic growth and development in the Philippines, the operations of the Maharlika Investment Corporation must be fully transparent. At the same time, whatever financial exposure that LandBank and DBP would have in the MIF should be of such amounts that losing them in a soured investment vehicle would not endanger the fulfillment of their core mandate.
LandBank and DBP are primarily tasked to ensure loans are available for farmers and small and medium enterprises which, as admitted by an analyst of a commercial bank, are underserved by private banks and lenders because they are not as profitable.
With this concern, there should be a ceiling as to what portion of their financial muscles can LandBank and DBP be allowed to put into the MIF. Again, this is left to the sound judgment of legislators who, with the law they would pass, would tie the hands of both LandBank and DBP.
Let’s just hope that the lunacy and vested interests that marked the passage of laws now breaking the backs of Filipinos, like the Oil Deregulation Law, would be absent in the crafting of the MIF.
Here, this Contrarian may be too overly optimistic.